28. There are five
possible isomers for the bicyclo[3.3.0]octatrienes, of which A is
one. Do an MM analysis (including pi calculations) for A and its
four isomers; move the pair of double bonds around the left-hand five-membered
ring in order to generate the other structures. Similarly, do the complete
analysis for the homologous B and its four positional isomers. Comment
on the importance of pi-conjugation in stabilizing the various [3.3.0]
and [4.3.0] systems.
[Griesbeck, A. G.; Peters, K.; Peters, E.-M.; von Schnering, H. G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1990, 29, 803.]
105A. 1,3-Butadiene
is the simplest conjugated hydrocarbon. Calculate the energy and structure
(including bond angles, bond lengths, and degree of non-planarity of the
diene system) as substituents are introduced; compare your answers with
those in the article. Do calculations on the parent; on the three possible
monomethyl derivatives; on the 2,3-dimethyl and 2,3-di-t- butyl
derivatives; and on the three stereoisomeric 1,2,3,4-tetramethyl compounds
(i.e., 3,4- dimethyl-2,4-hexadiene).
[Roth, W. R.; Adamczak, O.; Brueckmann, R.; Lennartz, H.-W.; Boese, R.; Chem. Ber. 1991, 124, 2499.]
162. Experimental
work and ab initio calculations on 1,3-cyclohexadiene and on its
mono and dibenzo derivatives suggest that the diene ring is non-planar;
i.e., steric considerations, apparently, take precedence over conjugation.
Do MMX calculations on the preferred conformation (whichever it may be)
and then use FXTOR (PCMODEL) to force the molecule to minimize in a non-preferred
conformation. Compare your computed energies, angles, and dihedral angles
with those in the article.
[Sygula, A.; Rabideau, P. W. THEOCHEM 1992, 94, 117.]
177. Bicyclo[3.2.0]-1,3-heptadiene,
shown to the right, is very unstable and can rearrange via both [1,5] sigmatropic
shifts of H and [1,5] sigmatropic shift of a CH2 group. Compute
the heats of formation of the four isomers shown and compare the values
with those in the reference. By examining geometric parameters (angles,
dihedral angles, bond lengths) and comparing them with the values in the
article, try to establish an explanation for the order of stability of
these isomers.
[Angermund, K. P.; Betz, P.; Butenschön, H. Chem. Ber. 1993, 126, 713.]
225. Detailed molecular
mechanics and AM1 semi-empirical calculations have been reported on the
various conformations of conjugated 1,3- and unconjugated 1,4- cycloheptadiene.
Using MMX, determine the energies, angles, and dihedral angles of these
compounds; compare your results with those in the cited article.
[Yavari, I.; Mousavi, M. F.; Shaabini, A.; Nori-Shargh, D. J. Chem. Res. 1994, 272.]
227. Two recent papers
present detailed experimental and theoretical work on various tert-
butyl derivatives of 1,3-butadiene. Either Part A or Part B would constitute
a suitable MMX project.
A. Compute the energies and structures of 2-t-butyl- and of 2,3- di-t-butyl-1,3-butadiene (R3 = t-Bu or R3 = R4 = t-Bu). Compare your calculated geometrical parameters with the experimental and calculated values in the first article cited below; pay particular attention to the question of planarity of the conjugated diene and to the dihedral angle between C1 of the diene and one of the methyl groups; discuss the similarities and discrepancies.
B. A chart of the various t-butyl substituted compounds is found on p 1470 of the second article cited below. It is alleged (p 1476 and Table 10) that most of the mono- and di-substituted compounds have a C1 to C4 dihedral angle of 180°; included in this list are R1 = t-Bu; R2 = t-Bu; R1 = R2 = t-Bu; R1 = R5 = t-Bu; R1 = R6 = t-Bu; and R2 = R5 = t-Bu. All of the others (R3 = t-Bu; R1 = R3 = t-Bu; R2 = R3 = t-Bu; R1 = R4 = t-Bu; R2 = R4 = t-Bu; and R3 = R4 = t-Bu) are alleged to have dihedral angles that are as large as 90° for the especially strained cases. Use MMX to determine these dihedral angles; do you agree that only those compounds having t-butyl on an "interior" carbon (position 3 or 4) deviate from an anti, coplanar conformation?
[Traetteberg, M.; Hopf, H.; Lipka, H.; Hänel, R.; Chem.
Ber. 1994, 127, 1459;
Traetteberg, M.; Bakken, P.; Hopf, Hänel, R.; ibid. 1994,
127, 1469.]
230. A recent article
presents experimental data for the relative energies of the E or
Z 3- ethylidenecyclohexenes and of the three possible cyclohexadienes
having ethyl attached to an sp2 carbon (two conjugated, one
not; see structures at right). Do MMX calculations on these five isomers
and compare the computed energy values with the experimental energies.
Discuss and rationalize any differences found.
[Taskinen, E.; Nummerlin, K. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 11693.]
Back to Glactone | Molecular Modeling | Graduate Molecular Modeling